Copyright belongs to person using tool not to the tool!
(At least as far as I know, in Oct, 2020. Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer) Think of a photographer versus a camera.
Food for thought: If AI art is more aesthetically pleasing than human generated art, why teach humans to art?
"Giarrusso outlines five different types of misinformation:
Food for thought: How could you prove that you did not use AI to create a work? Even hundreds of years ago, artists used tools like mirrors and shadows.
This person does not exist! Imagined by a GAN (generative adversarial network)
StyleGAN2 (Dec 2019) - Karras et al. and Nvidia (Don't panic. Learn how it works [1] [2] [3])
Food for thought: If you can create Deep Fakes of actors, do you really need people anymore?
Image accessed from 10/19/2020 by AI tool at:
Can you guess which cat is real? 5 of the cats do not exist!
Food for thought... Will it matter to an artist studying anatomy whether the cat is real or not?
Images accessed 10/19/2020 from the following websites:
About Us • Contact Us • FVTC Terms of Service • Sitemap
FVTC Privacy Statement • FVTC Library Services Accessibility Statement
Fox Valley Technical College • Library Services • 1825 N. Bluemound Drive • Room G113
Appleton, WI 54912-2277 • United States • (920) 735-5653
© 2021 • Fox Valley Technical College • All Rights Reserved.
The https://library.fvtc.edu/ pages are hosted by SpringShare. Springshare Privacy Policy.