Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Evaluating Sources: Fraud or Flawed?

Find out who is providing the content and why. Get information from different sources. Be skeptical.

Peer Review process varies widely. In general, the faster the review, the less trustworthy.

Pixabay Insects by illuvis Brett-Hondow and adepsych camo predators

Unfortunately, there are fake publishers and organizations that try to mimic the best camouflaged insect pests. 

Be wary of "too good to be true"  FAST peer review and FAST publication for a FEE.  They get the fee, and usually publish anything that gets submitted (This ia a variation of Vanity Publishing).  Sometimes they even create an "association" that publishes journals. 

If you select "Peer-reviewed" from a Library Database, you will get more trustworthy results

Three Types of Errors in Research

1. Ethics violation
A. Fabricated prints
B. Dry benching (estimating results without completing an examination)
C. Intentional erroneous results
D. Covering up mistakes

2. Honest errors
A. Lack of training and mentoring
B. Feeling pressure to complete work or being overwhelmed with work
C. Administrative errors or complacency

3. Biased oversight

SCIENTISTS NOT ALWAYS RELIABLE Good reason to get multiple sources of information.

chat loading...

About UsContact UsFVTC Terms of ServiceSitemap
FVTC Privacy StatementFVTC Library Services Accessibility Statement
Our goal is to be as unbiased as possible. Any commercial mentions on our website are for instructional purposes only.

Fox Valley Technical College • Library Services • 1825 N. Bluemound Drive • Room G113
Appleton, WI 54912-2277 • United States • (920) 735-5653
© 2022 • Fox Valley Technical College • All Rights Reserved.

The pages are hosted by SpringShare. Springshare Privacy Policy.