Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Health Information on the Internet: Fish To Avoid: Case study

Introduction: You find an interesting article and - you want to believe what it says.

Fun facts are fun.  They are a great way engage your audience. It is much easier to let someone else do the research and hand you the answers. It feels comfortable to trust until you have reason to doubt, which makes it easier to manipulate you.

Step 1: Read article and evaluate

Article Analysis by Val Magno, Information Specialist

Content Summary: Article is based on Cufone's advice, which may be backed by her data, but her data may reflect eco-friendly and sustainable farming bias.

Is"12 Fish You Should Never Eat" 

Current?  Yes, reasonably.

Relevant? Yes, if  you want to feel like you are doing something positive to protect the environment.

Opinion or data based? Article is based on opinion > which is based on potentially biased view of data.

Authoritative? Is Cufone an authority in the fisheries management industry?  Yes. Marianne Cufone, Executive Director of Recirculating Farms Coalition.  The Recirculating Farms Coalition is a US trade organization for hydroponic farmers.

Biased?  Yes.  Bias: Against industrialization of oceans for money at the cost of ocean and food-fish species integrity, diversity, and health.  In favor of careful consideration of fisheries management and leans towards sustainable (productive over long periods at reasonable expense)  farming methods.

Accurate?  Depends on your point of view and  the data you prefer to view.  If your bias is towards making a lot of money from a world resource without taking responsibility for the impact, then you may disagree with her advice

Does the article reflect the data found in the references? Let's see...

Some articles put in hyperlinks to their resources.  Other times you need to figure the name of a person or resource being quoted, and any other identifying information. 

You can then google them along with the topic to see
1) Are they an authority? 
2) Does the quote sound like something they would say?
3) Can you find any other published content attributed to them?

With this article, you could easily google “Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch” or “NOAA Fisheries”. Fortunately, the sources are linked out from this article.

Article to be examined: "12 Fish You Should Never Eat" BY EMILY MAIN AND RACHEL CLARK in Good Housekeeping Nov 29, 2021

Assumptions?

"Good Housekeeping" magazine has been in business a long time, so must provide good information.   

Bias: Providing interesting articles to increase paid subscriptions and create audience for advertisers. Make money to continue publishing.

Brand: Tips and useful information for making your home and garden comfortable and special. Implied promise: "Do this" and you can feel pride when showing your place to friends, family, & neighbors. Reputation advantage: Trusted. Not a tabloid*Reputation risk? Brand can be tarnished if too much misinformation is published. Having editors that check for accuracy protects the brand. 

Brand impact from publishing misinformation? Diluted, can blame the author. 

Individual impact of misinformation? To you, probably not much, as long as you don't have health issues that complicate your diet, like pregnancy or some other condition.  A little poison now and then, or over fishing, may not affect you adversely.  Some people might get sick. Some individuals may gain a fortune or go bankrupt. 

Advertiser impact from misinformation being published?  Since misinformation can use emotional manipulation instead of facts, more eyes may be drawn to content; misinformation may be an advantage to advertisers - until the brand of a publication is tarnished.

Global Impact of Misinformation? Some industries may over-fish an area and ruin the habitat or cause the endangered species to go extinct. Wrong solutions may waste money, time, and effort.  Wrong habitats and species could be protected or destroyed.

 

*Tabloids: Also known as gossip-rags or shock-press. Viewer expectation should be racy entertainment rather than accuracy and facts.

Cufone's advice

Article is based on advice from Marianne Cufone, Executive Director of Recirculating Farms Coalition. The Recirculating Farms Coalition is a US trade organization for hydroponic farmers.

1 AVOID Imported Farmed Shrimp
Eat this Instead: U.S. Shrimp, Key West Pinks, Rock Shrimp and Gulf Shrimp

2  AVOID Imported Catfish
Eat this instead: Domestic, farm-raised catfish. "

3  AVOID Sharkes, Skate and Rays
Eat this instead: Pacific halibut and Atlantic mackerel. (And when shopping for scallops, avoid cookie-cutter perfect ones.)
Surprise!  "If you see sea scallops that are a uniform size and shape, you may be looking at shark, skate or rays.”

4  AVOID Atlantic Cod (for now_  cod stocks collapsed in the mid-1990s and were in such disarray that the species has been listed as one step above endangered 
Eat this instead: Pacific cod

5  AVOID Tuna
Eat this instead: Tinned sardines or even organic tinned chicken.

6  AVOID Wild Caviar (fish eggs) from beluga and wild-caught sturgeon
Eat this instead: fish eggs from American Lake Sturgeon or American Hackleback/Shovelnose Sturgeon caviar from the Mississippi River system; California Caviar 

7  AVOID Chilean Sea Bass is the commercial name for endangered Patagonian Toothfish
Eat insted: U.S. hook-and-line–caught haddock.

8  AVOID Orange Roughy 
Eat this instead: Opt for yellow snapper or domestic catfish 

9 AVOID American Eel often high in PCBs and mercury, and eel populations are too often overharvested.
Eat this instead:  Atlantic- or Pacific-caught squid instead.

10  AVOID Imported King Crab (Unprotected crab from Russia)
Eat this instead: True Alaskan King Crab from Alaska

11  AVOID Atlantic Salmon
Wild caught Pacific salmon; salmon from Alaskan fisheries.  Varieties:  King, Sockeye, Pink, Keta and Coho salmon.

12 AVOID Octopus  - too smart to use as food.  
Eat this instead: Squid

Safe-to-eat fish based on how and where they’re farmed or caught.

Bass (including Striped and Suzuki)
Bluefish
Crawfish
Flounder (Arrowtooth, California, and others)
Halibut (Pacific)
Hogfish (Hog Snapper, from the Gulf of Mexico)
Herring
Lionfish
Mahi (caught by and or with a fishing pole)
Perch (various types)
Any farmed shellfish
Red Drum (a.k.a. Redfish)
Salmon (wild caught)
Scallops (diver caught)

Step 2 Looking at other authoritative resources

You can jump head to box addressing question:

Step 2a: Review References: Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch

Lots of information...
Seafood Species Database with very detailed information

 

Exploration led me to Guides:

Consumer guides by region

Bingo!  Easy to use reference:
Consumer Guide from Seafoodwatch.org

Seafood watch advisory for central US

How does that compare with Article?  First, I will gather more notes from the other resources discussed in article, and find if Cufone'e is an authoritative source.

Step 2b: Review References: NOAA Fisheries

NOAA FishWatch.gov https://www.fishwatch.gov/ 
>Tab  https://www.fishwatch.gov/eating-seafood/health 

>Pull-Down Menu - More Information
>>  Eating Fish: What Pregnant Women and Parents Should Know redirects to 
Advice about Eating Fishhttps://www.fda.gov/food/consumers/advice-about-eating-fish with copy of Consumer Guide from Seafoodwatch.org

Do these resources confirm what Cufone advised?

Article is based on advice from Marianne Cufone, Executive Director of Recirculating Farms Coalition. The Recirculating Farms Coalition is a US trade organization for hydroponic farmers. She is an authoritative source with a bias towards environmental protection and stewardship.

Most of what the article reported Cufone as advising was confirmed by the resources mentioned in the article. Article may misrepresent what was advised due to recording or editorial oversight.

A few assertions were not collaborated by other sources:

For example, a disagreement about Coho and Sockeye Salmon. The article suggested them as an alternative, but they are also listed in ESA Threatened & Endangered database list https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species-directory/threatened-endangered.  
Maybe some Coho and Sockeye Salmon are not in danger, databases are specific to fish origin. They could be endangered in one region and not another.

The article listed Atlantic mackerel as an alternative, but this is listed as "Avoid" by Seafoodwatch National Consumer Guide https://www.seafoodwatch.org/globalassets/sfw/pdf/guides/seafood-watch-national-guide.pdf.  Status could be that the status changed, or is regional.

The Title "12 Fish You Should Never Eat " include shrimp and octopus, which are not fish.  The title should have referred to seafood you should avoid. 

Otherwise the reported information was very accurate, with some more or less collaborated by other authoritative sources.  I would give the article an "A" rating. 
 

chat loading...

About UsContact UsFVTC Terms of ServiceSitemap
FVTC Privacy StatementFVTC Library Services Accessibility Statement
Our goal is to be as unbiased as possible. Any commercial mentions on our website are for instructional purposes only.

Fox Valley Technical College • Library Services • 1825 N. Bluemound Drive • Room G113
Appleton, WI 54912-2277 • United States • (920) 735-5653
© 2022 • Fox Valley Technical College • All Rights Reserved.

The https://library.fvtc.edu/ pages are hosted by SpringShare. Springshare Privacy Policy.